Enes Us

About

I completed my M.A. at Middle East Technical University in Ankara, Turkey, where I was a member of the METU Language and Cognitive Development Laboratory. My M.A. research, conducted under the supervision of Duygu (Özge) Sarısoy, examined children's interpretation of disjunction in Turkish (Thesis , Slides). I received my B.A. in Foreign Language Education with minors in Psychology from the same institution in 2022.

My research interests lie broadly in experimental semantics and pragmatics, with a particular focus on language acquisition. I have worked on ellipsis, conditionals, and disjunction in Turkish.

Enes Us

Contact

enes.us@metu.edu.tr

Research

  • (2025). Verb-Stranding VP Ellipsis in Turkish. In Barrie, Michael (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 229–238. []
    Turkish allows null object constructions, and these constructions show certain properties, suggesting the presence of ellipsis operation. Previous analyses argue that these properties follow from Argument Ellipsis, but I argue that Verb-stranding VP analysis is present in Turkish. Providing evidence from the ellipsis of predicates, null adverb interpretations, and light verbs, I propose that VP internal constituents are not elided independently but rather they go unpronounced as part of the deletion of larger constituents (VPs).
  • [Under revision] , . "Morphological access to alternatives fails to boost scalar implicatures: Interpretation of disjunction in Turkish-speaking children."
    Sentences involving disjunction, such as "The girl likes pizza or pasta" often give rise to the inference that she does not like both. However, several studies report that children tend to interpret the sentence inclusively (i.e., she likes pizza or pasta, or possibly both) or conjunctively (i.e., she likes both). The alternatives-based account attributes this to children's difficulty accessing stronger lexical alternatives, while the ambiguity account proposes that disjunction is ambiguous for children. In this study, we tested these competing predictions using a Truth-Value Judgment Task with Turkish-speaking children, drawing on the unique morphology of Turkish disjunction markers, one of which contains the stronger alternative. Overall, children interpreted disjunctions inclusively or conjunctively, but not exclusively, even when a disjunction marker could facilitate access to a stronger alternative. These findings challenge the alternatives-based account and align with the ambiguity account, suggesting that access to a stronger alternative alone is not sufficient for achieving adult-like interpretations.
  • [In preparation] , . "X-Marking in Turkish"

Presentations

Curriculum Vitae